No Time At All
April 26, 2011
Scientists suggest spacetime has no time dimension April 25, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
Scientists propose that clocks measure the numerical order of material change in space, where space is a fundamental entity; time itself is not a fundamental physical entity. Image credit: Wikimedia Commons.
(PhysOrg.com) -- The concept of time as a way to measure the duration of events is not only deeply intuitive, it also plays an important role in our mathematical descriptions of physical systems. For instance, we define an object’s speed as its displacement per a given time. But some researchers theorize that this Newtonian idea of time as an absolute quantity that flows on its own, along with the idea that time is the fourth dimension of spacetime, are incorrect. They propose to replace these concepts of time with a view that corresponds more accurately to the physical world: time as a measure of the numerical order of change.
Posted at: 12:55 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
March 29, 2011
The whole question of free will is based on a mistaken model of an organism, that there is some conscious 'I' that controls actions of the whole organism. It is actually the organism as a whole that is partially free (in the sense that enough random quantum processes are involved in its internal functioning that its actions are not completely determined by external events). The conscious 'I' is not who we are. We are our entire organism. The conscious 'I' is simply a high level quality control monitor which oversees and sometimes generates feedback that corrects or modifies actions generated by the whole organism at an unconscious level.
Yes, but there is more to it than that.
The total human organism contains many levels of separate consciousnesses — from individual cells, through different organs that control unconscious (autonomic) life support processes, to the individual thinking, discriminating, choosing consciousness (global awareness, will, etc.) that we identify as "I am", "I see", "I feel", "I think", etc.
Here's the way I see it ... Since, according to my ABC theory and model, the overall body (as well as every organism within it) is composed of a series of fractal involved harmonic fields...
Posted at: 12:06 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
February 17, 2011
> QM is nothing more than symbolic mathematics describing the dynamics
of particle-waveforms and their interactions. It has nothing to do with
explaining anything about the true cause or nature of total reality as
it actually exists. However, since its conclusions about such realities
are open to interpretation, it's perfectly reasonable to link its
apparently mystical findings (such as wave particle dualities, EPR
paradoxes, virtual particles, etc.) with the directly observed realities
experienced in higher states of consciousness that clearly (logically)
explains such paradoxes and other anomalies (such as QM's and GRT's
incompatibilities, and inconsistencies) .
> The only formerly mystical things QM has proved is the existence of so
called "virtual particles" in the Planck volume — which must be the
quantum aspects of the higher order hyperspace (metaphysical) fields
postulated by string-M theories (like electrons/photons are parts of the
lower order EM fields). Consequently, it's perfectly reasonable to link
quantum (and string) physics with the metaphysical astral, mental and
spiritual worlds of the so called (pejoratively by the dyed in the wool
> Unfortunately, those materialists (whether faith-based religionists or
not) — knowing nothing about actual higher order metaphysical
astral, mental and spiritual field...
Posted at: 10:02 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
January 16, 2011
Perhaps the answer to the question of possible DNA teleportation would become clearer if we accepted the holographic principle
suggested by Bohm and Pribram, and studied the work on the Phantom DNA and DNA wave bio-computer of Peter Gariaev
Phantom DNA- http://www.emergent mind.org/ gariaev06. htm
Proposed proof of Gariaev theory http://www.frontier net.net/~ kbrill/Gallery/ PIOE.htm
Open letter from Gariaev on wave-biogenetics http://www.fractal. org/Life- Science-Technolo gy/Peter- Gariaev.htm
Doesn't all this seem very consistent with a biohological fractal field theory of cosmogenesis, mind and consciousness, as outlined in my ABC theory?
Leon Maurer http://knol. google.com/ k/how-it- all-began#
bohm, holographic concept, holographic universe, phantom dna
Posted at: 02:01 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
Nonlocality With Time Reversibility
January 13, 2011
Nonlocality With Time Reversibility
Excerpts from The Unconscious Quantum: Metaphysics in Modern Physics and Cosmology
Victor J. Stenger 1995. Buffalo NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 145-155.
End notes have been included in the text, with brackets.
Zigzagging through the Vacuum Aether
Some think quantum mechanics can provide nonlocality without glazed eyes. J. P. Vigier has pointed out that an aether consistent with causal precedence and relativity can theoretically exist [Kypriandis, A. and J. P. Vigier. "Action-at-a Distance: The Mystery of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations" in Selleri 1988
, p. 273]. This has been known for some time and not regarded as troublesome. Vigier refers back to a 1951 paper in which Dirac argued that a quantum aether would not have a definite velocity at certain spacetime points, because of the uncertainty principle [Dirac 1951
]. Consequently, an aether in which all velocities are equally probable becomes possible. The resulting state is a vacuum, but at least it does not violate relativity. As mentioned above, Vigier and others have suggested that the vacuum aether may correspond to Bohm's quantum potential.
The vacuum is capable of producing interactions between particles at effectively spacelike separations. This occurs when quantum fluctuations in the...
epr, paradox, reverse time, spacetime, vacuum
Posted at: 12:32 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
January 10, 2011
Posted by: "Leon Maurer" firstname.lastname@example.org leonmaurer1 Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:01 am (PST)
In constructing a valid and consistent, all inclusive theory of consciousness -- we must first ask and satisfactorily answer the following questions:.. Even if only as a theoretical hypothesis of a fundamental cosmogenetic reality that explains them all. 1. What is the necessary condition of individual consciousness (in terms of position, motion, location, etc) , that enables it to perceive, as an instantaneous gestalt, a 3-D composite image of the outer world -- which appears to be an orderly matrix of infinitesimal adjacent pixels (that are apparently detected by individual retinal cells) each transforming and transmitting different qualities of color, tone, shade, etc.? 2. If the visual image were a physical entity in our brain, with each pixel determined by a single neuron or group of neurons -- why does the overall image remain stationary when we turn our head? And, if the fixed image was a direct perception of the outer world, why is the observing consciousness, no matter where located in physical space, always at the exact center of the total space observed? 3. What is the nature of the *medium* that carries the...
Posted at: 12:20 PM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
December 17, 2010
Regardless of all the supposed scientific claims made... None of it in any way negates the fact that the potential mass-energy or G-force (as infinite angular spin momentum) contained in the underlying unconditioned absolute (0°K) space, is the fundamental basis of all manifest existence... .
Therefore, since information AND mass-energy would have to be conserved as Hawkings admitted) there is ample logical evidence (and some recent scientific findings) to believe that the spacetime universe is cyclic in nature (as recently considered by Penrose).
If so, then the total information contained in the DNA could very well be extracted from the total evolutional information of the previous cyclic manifestation of the cosmos from its absolute zero (laya) point... Since this absolute zero (°K) SPACE containing this total information is located everywhere at the ZPE origin of all initial particle-fields in spacetime -- all spatial information must be a hologram -- guided solely by the holographic principle, along with the the DNA and the brain (as postulated by Bohm and Pribram).
Since that information (stored in every zero-point origin of all harmonically resonant fields and forms in spacetime) could be the basis of all DNA encodings, and even the formation of galaxies...
Posted at: 10:01 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
generating from nothing
December 9, 2010
Dec. 8, 2010
Theoretical breakthrough: Generating matter and antimatter from the vacuum
ANN ARBOR, Mich.—Under just the right conditions—which involve an ultra-high-intensity laser beam and a two-mile-long particle accelerator—it could be possible to create something out of nothing, according to University of Michigan researchers.
The scientists and engineers have developed new equations that show how a high-energy electron beam combined with an intense laser pulse could rip apart a vacuum into its fundamental matter and antimatter components, and set off a cascade of events that generates additional pairs of particles and antiparticles.
"We can now calculate how, from a single electron, several hundred particles can be produced. We believe this happens in nature near pulsars and neutron stars," said Igor Sokolov, an engineering research scientist who conducted this research along with associate research scientist John Nees, emeritus electrical engineering professor Gerard Mourou and their colleagues in France.
At the heart of this work is the idea that a vacuum is not exactly nothing.
"It is better to say, following theoretical physicist Paul Dirac, that a vacuum, or nothing, is the combination of matter and antimatter—particles and antiparticles.Their density is tremendous, but we cannot perceive any of them because their observable...
antimatter, matter, vacuum
Posted at: 11:26 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
November 29, 2010
Mon Nov 29, 2010 1:50 am (PST)
This self serving favorable analysis of author #4 by Author_x might make some sense, if he could have shown how structured duality and tetrahedrons coupled with 6^n combinations of such structures have anything to do with explaining the experience of consciousness along with its source and actual mechanisms (the real hard problems of consciousness study)...
And, also, there might be some credibility to his trial theories, if he did not compare his tetrahedral starting geometry with Buckminster Fuller--who actually said the cosmos starts with a vector equilibrium- -which is fundamentally a cube-octahedroon composed of 64 secondarily derived nested tetrahedrons. Obviously, the initial radiant cosmic field, as an inscribed hyperspherical double helix toroid centered on the ZP crossover of three perpendicular axial dimensions of such a cube octahedron-- could be considered the first nested structural duality. (Is this why Pythagorus said the universe geometrizes and is based on numbers and ratios?)
It's also quite self evident (as well as experimentally demonstrable) and now more or less universally accepted by most leading edge physical scientists-- that total space and all particle/wave based forms of matter are fundamentally standing waves of primal...
Posted at: 09:27 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink
November 25, 2010
Open letter to Milo Wolff, and other scientists claiming all matter is made of waves and the electron is a standing wave: Ref: http://quantummatte r.com/articles_ html/body_ point.html http://www.glafreni ere.com/matter. htm
Since the questions of consciousness, mind, memory (qualia and composite structural information) and the source of the fundamental forces that drive the quantum wave motion have never been adequately explained... The concept that electron spin results from the reflected in-out standing wave motion (as some have also claimed in this and other forums) appears to put the cart before the horse... That is, they say that the wave motion apparently comes before the force or energy that drives it. How could this be? Since when does the effect come before the cause? Are we to believe that quantum wave motion just appears magically out of nothing? Or, when you say "electron spin" are we referring to the wave form's orbital motion rather than the actual source of the angular momentum that drives it (as well as its virtual sub quantum harmonics?
In my carefully considered view, there must be *something* that could possibly exist (outside of total cosmic metric space and time) without prior cause--before the Aether and the quantum...
Posted at: 10:01 AM | 0 Comments | Add Comment | Permalink